Find the Best DUI & DWI Lawyers Nationwide - TeamDUI.com

FREE DUI & DWI Attorney Consultation - 24 hours a day - 365 days a year. Call 1-844-TEAM-DUI or search online here one for your State to get out of a DUI.

  • Home
  • DUI Defense
    • Find The Best DUI Trial Lawyer
    • Do I Need a DUI Lawyer?
    • DUI Legal Defenses
      • Legal Traffic Stops
        • DUI Illegal Stops
      • DUI Probable Cause
      • Articulable Suspicion
      • DUI Police Search
      • Warrantless Arrest
      • Speedy Trial Denial
      • Fight DUI Additional Charges
    • Implied Consent
      • DUI Implied Consent Test
      • Implied Consent/Miranda Rights
      • Not Answering Implied Consent & Consequences
      • DUI Refusal Implied Consent Test: Loss of Driving Privileges
      • Officer Chooses Implied Consent Test
    • Elements Of A DUI
      • DUI Roadblocks
      • DUI Required Degree of Impairment
      • Probable Cause for the Stop
      • What Is “Operating A Vehicle?”
  • DUI Breath Test
    • Breathalyzer Defenses
    • Field Sobriety Tests
      • Probable Cause and Field Sobriety Tests
      • Roadside Agility Tests and Eye Test
      • Faulty DUI Field Test Training
    • Breathalyzer Machine
    • Portable Breath Tests
    • DUI Breath Test Refusal
  • DUI Blood Testing
    • Blood Test
      • Blood Alcohol Content
        • Alcohol Content Common Drinks
        • BAC – Widmark’s Formula
    • Refusal to Test
    • DUI Drugs
  • Urine Test
    • Pooled Urine and BAC
    • Variability of UAC to BAC Ratio
  • Court Info
    • DUI Bail Options
      • DUI Bail Terms
    • Investigating A DUI-DWI Case
      • DUI Defense Options
      • Police Reports
      • Field Evidence
    • Preliminary Hearings
    • DUI Pretrial Motions
    • DUI Plea Bargains
      • Plea Bargaining and Sentencing
    • DUI Trial Lawyer Explains DUI Trial Process
      • A DUI Jury Trial Can Be Advantageous
      • DUI Expert Witnesses
    • Know Your Legal Rights
    • Remain Silent – Protect Your Legal Rights
    • How to WIN or Reduce a DUI Case
  • DUI Laws
    • DUI vs DWI: Acronyms for Drunk Driving Laws in Our States
    • Aggravated DUI
    • DUI First Offense
  • DUI Penalties
    • DUI Cost
    • Driver’s License Issues
    • Administrative License Suspension
    • DUI Ignition Interlock Device
    • DUI Hardship License
  • Our DUI Attorneys
    • Find The Best DUI Trial Lawyer
    • DUI Lawyer Fees
  • DUI News
The constitutionality of “per se” statutes has been consistently upheld by the courts despite attacks on a number of grounds. “Per se” statutes have been most frequently challenged on the ground that they violate due process of law by creating an unconstitutional irrebuttable presumption of intoxication. The courts have refuted this assertion by holding that “per se” statutes create a new crime and not a presumption of intoxication. It has been held that in protecting the safety of its citizens a state legislature may determine that a driver with a blood alcohol concentration of .08% or more constitutes a serious and immediate threat to the public safety, and that the passage of a “per se” statute is a reasonable means of protecting the public safety.The constitutionality of “per se” statutes has also been challenged on a void for vagueness grounds. Defendants have alleged that because they have no way of knowing when their blood alcohol concentration reaches the prohibited level, “per se” statutes fail to give adequate notice of the forbidden conduct and are therefore unconstitutionally vague. The courts have rejected this argument, ruling that the consumption of alcohol should put a person of ordinary intelligence on notice that he or she is in jeopardy of violating the statute and that any person who drives after drinking should reasonably be aware of the possibility of violating the statute.

It has been held that the enforcement of a “per se” statute is not an unreasonable or unconstitutional exercise of police power. It has also been held that a “per se” statute does not violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution. Finally, the use of an implied consent law in conjunction with a “per se” statute has been upheld against a claim that the conclusiveness of the evidence of blood alcohol concentration violates a defendant’s privilege against self-incrimination.

Contact a specialized DUI-DWI attorney to learn your case options and how to fight the drunk or impaired charges against you. TeamDUI.com is available 24 hours per day, 7 days a week at 1-855-350-TEAM.

Related Articles
DUI Blood Tests
#1 Rule – Remain Silent
Driver’s License Issues
Implied Consent
Contact Us
For a FREE Case Evaluation with a specialized DUI-DWI attorney, call or submit your case details.We are available 24 hours/7 days a week

1-844-TEAM-DUI (1-844-832-6384)

Copyright 2021. William C. Head. All Rights Reserved.

Copyright © 2021 · TeamDUI.com ·

Copyright © 2021 · TeamDUI.com on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in